2026 looking at 2028

St. Maarten is walking into 2026 with two truths at once. The first is obvious: this could be challenging year for government. The second is easier to miss: it could still end up being a banner year, not because the road will be smooth, but because there is a long list of rollouts, reforms, and projects already queued up that can produce real, visible movement if executed with discipline.

The early months will test that discipline. The budget situation alone, at least for the first five months, will place the Minister of Finance under a microscope. Yet it would be naive to assume the minister is not already expecting exactly that. It would be even more naive to assume the world pauses while St. Maarten argues through its fiscal process. Life keeps charging rent, groceries keep rising or falling, school fees still come due, small businesses still need customers, and people still judge leadership by what they can feel in daily life.

That is where the coming months of expected doom-and-gloom bantering usually misses the point. The public can follow drama in Parliament, sure, but most people are not emotionally invested in the urination competition that politics often becomes. They want relief and improvement where both are possible, and they want visible competence where competence is overdue. Everything else becomes fodder. Not insignificant, not unimportant, not irrelevant, but fodder, consumed daily by political junkies, recycled, and forgotten as soon as the next argument arrives.

Now here is the thing about 2026. The reality is that politics here is like politics everywhere: it is never far from the next election. Even when leaders insist they are focused only on governance, the calendar is always running in the background. So unless a government or party drastically slips up, incumbency tends to carry advantages. It is not just about ministerial visibility, it is about the public’s tendency to reward what feels stable, familiar, and workable, especially if daily life does not worsen. Don't think for a second, like anywhere else, your politicians do not understand this.

That is why 2026 matters so much to both sides. The incumbents understand that if they deliver real improvements people can feel, 2028 could become record setting. The opposition understands the same equation, which is why it will spend the year trying to define “delivery” in its own terms, and trying to convince the public that what is being delivered is either insufficient or misdirected.

This is where the national conversation often becomes distorted. A government can be doing real work that takes time, yet still lose the story if it cannot translate that work into tangible outcomes people feel. An opposition can be raising legitimate concerns, yet lose credibility if it becomes addicted to performance and outrage. The public senses the difference, not always in technical detail, but in tone and intent. People can tell when critique is meant to improve their lives, and when it is meant only to score points.

The smartest political actors, on both sides, will treat 2026 as a year of proof. For the government, proof means moving from plans to results, choosing a few deliverables that touch daily life and executing them relentlessly. It also means resisting the temptation to govern for headlines, because headlines fade, but a functioning government, for the people, now that sticks. For the opposition, proof means delivering in its own way: constructive pressure, and credible legislative proposals that show it understands not only what is wrong, but what can be done. This is the so-called "governing from the opposition" approach.

What makes this year potentially productive is that both roles, governing and opposing, can serve the country when performed well. St. Maarten benefits when government has the humility to accept scrutiny and adjust, and when opposition has the maturity to prioritize people over spectacle. The country loses when both sides treat every national issue as an opportunity to embarrass the other. Those exchanges only produces noise, and, frankly, noise hasn't done anything about GEBE.

So yes, the year could be challenging. The budget will be a pressure point early on, the Minister of Finance will be tested, and the running commentary will be relentless. But as the old saying goes, difficulty does not cancel possibility. If the rollouts and reforms already slated for 2026 are executed with focus, and if the political class keeps one eye on the long-game without letting the long-game swallow the national interest, this can be a year where people start to feel something shift in their favor.

At the end of the day, only the people matter. But still, no one should pretend the long-game is not always in play. The mature challenge for 2026 is to recognize that reality, and then govern, and oppose, in a way that proves the long-game can still include the public. Because when the game ends, they vote.

‍